Reference
  • Supreme Court
  • Home
  • Slip Opinions
  • Docket
  • Tenth Circuit
  • Home
  • Opinions (10th Cir.)
  • Opinions (Washburn Univ.)
  • Tenth Circuit and Fed. Rules Appellate Procedure
  • Docket via PACER Log-in
  • Register for PACER
  • Oral Argument Calendar
  • Related Sites
  • Federal Court Links
  • U.S. Sentencing Commission
  • Admin Office U.S. Courts
  • PACER Service Center
  • U.S. Code via LII
  • Code Federal Regs via LII
  • Federal Rules Crim Procedure via LII
  • Federal Rules of Evidence via LII
  • U.S. Sentencing Guidelines
  • GPO Access
  • Thomas U.S. Congress
  • Federal Criminal Jury Instructions
  • Oklahoma Public Legal Research System
Other Useful Links
  • How Appealing
  • SCOTUS Blog
  • Jurist
  • Scribes
  • Legal Writing Institute
  • Wayne Schiess's
    legal-writing blog
  • Legal Writing Prof Blog
  • Legal Research & Writing
  • Council of Appellate
    Staff Attys
  • Second Opinions
    (2nd Circuit)
  • Sixth Circuit Law
    (6th Circuit)
  • Criminal Appeal
    (9th Circuit)
  • Rocky Mtn Appellate Blog
    (10th Circuit)
  • Abstract Appeal
    (11th Circuit)
  • Sentencing Law & Policy
  • On Appeal
  • Inter-Alia
    (Legal Research)
  • Appellate Law & Practice
  • Jim Calloway's Law Practice Tips
  • LegalWikiPro
  • Space Law Station
  • Space Law Probe
  • New Mexico Labor & Employment Law
  • Bag and Baggage
  • Terra Extraneus
  • The Rocket Docket

Navigate

  • Home
  • Author's Profile
  • Contact

Notice

    January 5, 2009.
    I'm back after a long absence from blogging. In the next few days I will be posting new summaries. Unfortunately, there will be a gap in coverage between June 26th and December 31st, 2008.
    - Russ

Public Service


Cost of the War in Iraq
(JavaScript Error)
To see more details, click here.

Visit

  • The liberal alternative to Drudge.
  • SomaFM independent internet radio

Credits

  • Powered by Blogger

  • Site Meter

Monday, November 14, 2005

Government must prove beyond reasonable doubt that real children are depicted in images in child pornography prosecution under 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(1)

SEARCH & SEIZURE/BURDEN OF PROOF/SENTENCING
United States v. Sims,
No. 03-2151, ___ F.3d ___ (10th Cir. Nov. 9, 2005)(New Mexico).

Appeal of convictions and sentence for attempting to entice minor to engage in sexual acts, traveling in interstate commerce for purpose of engaging in sexual acts with minor, and transporting child pornography by interactive computer system in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), 2423(b), 2252(a)(1), and 2252(a)(2).

HELD:

(1) Technical violation of search warrant (i.e., executing one day after expiration) does not require suppression of seized evidence if violation of warrant’s terms were not prejudicial or intentional.

(2) In prosecution for transporting by interactive computer system visual depictions of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(1), government must prove beyond reasonable doubt that real children are depicted in images giving rise to prosecution. However, expert testimony or identification of actual child-victims is not always necessary. In cases where no evidence suggests images are anything other than real, government need not offer evidence beyond images themselves because jury is capable of distinguishing between real and virtual images.

(3) Factual impossibility is not defense to offense involving enticement and exploitation of minors.

(4) Fictitious children used as part of undercover sting operation may be treated as separate victims for offense grouping purposes under sentencing guidelines.

(5) Attempting to entice minor to engage in sexual acts, traveling in interstate commerce for purpose of engaging in sexual acts with minor, and transporting child pornography by interactive computer system are offenses that inherently include serious threat of violence. Therefore, sentencing departure under U.S.S.G. § 5K2.13 based on diminished capacity is not permissible.

Read the opinion here.

posted by Russ at 12:10 PM


Comments on "Government must prove beyond reasonable doubt that real children are depicted in images in child pornography prosecution under 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(1)"

 

post a comment