Reference
  • Supreme Court
  • Home
  • Slip Opinions
  • Docket
  • Tenth Circuit
  • Home
  • Opinions (10th Cir.)
  • Opinions (Washburn Univ.)
  • Tenth Circuit and Fed. Rules Appellate Procedure
  • Docket via PACER Log-in
  • Register for PACER
  • Oral Argument Calendar
  • Related Sites
  • Federal Court Links
  • U.S. Sentencing Commission
  • Admin Office U.S. Courts
  • PACER Service Center
  • U.S. Code via LII
  • Code Federal Regs via LII
  • Federal Rules Crim Procedure via LII
  • Federal Rules of Evidence via LII
  • U.S. Sentencing Guidelines
  • GPO Access
  • Thomas U.S. Congress
  • Federal Criminal Jury Instructions
  • Oklahoma Public Legal Research System
Other Useful Links
  • How Appealing
  • SCOTUS Blog
  • Jurist
  • Scribes
  • Legal Writing Institute
  • Wayne Schiess's
    legal-writing blog
  • Legal Writing Prof Blog
  • Legal Research & Writing
  • Council of Appellate
    Staff Attys
  • Second Opinions
    (2nd Circuit)
  • Sixth Circuit Law
    (6th Circuit)
  • Criminal Appeal
    (9th Circuit)
  • Rocky Mtn Appellate Blog
    (10th Circuit)
  • Abstract Appeal
    (11th Circuit)
  • Sentencing Law & Policy
  • On Appeal
  • Inter-Alia
    (Legal Research)
  • Appellate Law & Practice
  • Jim Calloway's Law Practice Tips
  • LegalWikiPro
  • Space Law Station
  • Space Law Probe
  • New Mexico Labor & Employment Law
  • Bag and Baggage
  • Terra Extraneus
  • The Rocket Docket

Navigate

  • Home
  • Author's Profile
  • Contact

Notice

    January 5, 2009.
    I'm back after a long absence from blogging. In the next few days I will be posting new summaries. Unfortunately, there will be a gap in coverage between June 26th and December 31st, 2008.
    - Russ

Public Service


Cost of the War in Iraq
(JavaScript Error)
To see more details, click here.

Visit

  • The liberal alternative to Drudge.
  • SomaFM independent internet radio

Credits

  • Powered by Blogger

  • Site Meter

Wednesday, May 17, 2006

Sporting purpose exception to sentencing calculation does not apply if defendant uses firearms solely for hunting but also threatens to shoot people

SENTENCING
United States v. Sanders,
No. 05-8058, ___ F.3d ___ (10th Cir. May 16, 2006)(Wyoming).

Appeal of sentence for possessing firearms following misdemeanor domestic-violence conviction in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(9).

HELD: District court did not err by declining to apply “sporting purposes exception” of U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(2) to defendant’s sentencing guidelines calculation. Although it was uncontroverted that defendant obtained firearms for hunting purposes and that hunting had been their sole prior use, where defendant repeatedly stated that he intended to shoot someone, it was reasonable for court to infer that he actually meant to use those firearms for such purpose. Accordingly, court could properly find that in addition to sporting purpose, defendant acquired firearms for new purpose of using them to coerce or injure people.

Read the opinion here.

posted by Russ at 1:05 PM


Comments on "Sporting purpose exception to sentencing calculation does not apply if defendant uses firearms solely for hunting but also threatens to shoot people"

 

post a comment