Reference
  • Supreme Court
  • Home
  • Slip Opinions
  • Docket
  • Tenth Circuit
  • Home
  • Opinions (10th Cir.)
  • Opinions (Washburn Univ.)
  • Tenth Circuit and Fed. Rules Appellate Procedure
  • Docket via PACER Log-in
  • Register for PACER
  • Oral Argument Calendar
  • Related Sites
  • Federal Court Links
  • U.S. Sentencing Commission
  • Admin Office U.S. Courts
  • PACER Service Center
  • U.S. Code via LII
  • Code Federal Regs via LII
  • Federal Rules Crim Procedure via LII
  • Federal Rules of Evidence via LII
  • U.S. Sentencing Guidelines
  • GPO Access
  • Thomas U.S. Congress
  • Federal Criminal Jury Instructions
  • Oklahoma Public Legal Research System
Other Useful Links
  • How Appealing
  • SCOTUS Blog
  • Jurist
  • Scribes
  • Legal Writing Institute
  • Wayne Schiess's
    legal-writing blog
  • Legal Writing Prof Blog
  • Legal Research & Writing
  • Council of Appellate
    Staff Attys
  • Second Opinions
    (2nd Circuit)
  • Sixth Circuit Law
    (6th Circuit)
  • Criminal Appeal
    (9th Circuit)
  • Rocky Mtn Appellate Blog
    (10th Circuit)
  • Abstract Appeal
    (11th Circuit)
  • Sentencing Law & Policy
  • On Appeal
  • Inter-Alia
    (Legal Research)
  • Appellate Law & Practice
  • Jim Calloway's Law Practice Tips
  • LegalWikiPro
  • Space Law Station
  • Space Law Probe
  • New Mexico Labor & Employment Law
  • Bag and Baggage
  • Terra Extraneus
  • The Rocket Docket

Navigate

  • Home
  • Author's Profile
  • Contact

Notice

    January 5, 2009.
    I'm back after a long absence from blogging. In the next few days I will be posting new summaries. Unfortunately, there will be a gap in coverage between June 26th and December 31st, 2008.
    - Russ

Public Service


Cost of the War in Iraq
(JavaScript Error)
To see more details, click here.

Visit

  • The liberal alternative to Drudge.
  • SomaFM independent internet radio

Credits

  • Powered by Blogger

  • Site Meter

Thursday, July 06, 2006

Claim of statutory violation of speedy trial right is insufficient to qualify for certificate of appealability in 28 U.S.C. § 2255 habeas action

COLLATERAL REVIEW
United States v. Taylor,
No. 05-3417, ___ F.3d ___ (10th Cir. Jul. 5, 2006)(Kansas).

Appeal of conviction for bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a).

HELD: Certificate of appealability for habeas claim brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is not available for Speedy Trial Act violation where claim alleges only statutory violation. Under Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA), certificate of appealablity may issue only when applicant “has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” Thus, no matter how clearly § 2255 movant may show that district court erred in denying statutory claim in his habeas petition, he is not entitled to certificate of appealability to have claim heard on appeal.

Read the opinion here.

posted by Russ at 1:06 PM


Comments on "Claim of statutory violation of speedy trial right is insufficient to qualify for certificate of appealability in 28 U.S.C. § 2255 habeas action"

 

post a comment