Reference
  • Supreme Court
  • Home
  • Slip Opinions
  • Docket
  • Tenth Circuit
  • Home
  • Opinions (10th Cir.)
  • Opinions (Washburn Univ.)
  • Tenth Circuit and Fed. Rules Appellate Procedure
  • Docket via PACER Log-in
  • Register for PACER
  • Oral Argument Calendar
  • Related Sites
  • Federal Court Links
  • U.S. Sentencing Commission
  • Admin Office U.S. Courts
  • PACER Service Center
  • U.S. Code via LII
  • Code Federal Regs via LII
  • Federal Rules Crim Procedure via LII
  • Federal Rules of Evidence via LII
  • U.S. Sentencing Guidelines
  • GPO Access
  • Thomas U.S. Congress
  • Federal Criminal Jury Instructions
  • Oklahoma Public Legal Research System
Other Useful Links
  • How Appealing
  • SCOTUS Blog
  • Jurist
  • Scribes
  • Legal Writing Institute
  • Wayne Schiess's
    legal-writing blog
  • Legal Writing Prof Blog
  • Legal Research & Writing
  • Council of Appellate
    Staff Attys
  • Second Opinions
    (2nd Circuit)
  • Sixth Circuit Law
    (6th Circuit)
  • Criminal Appeal
    (9th Circuit)
  • Rocky Mtn Appellate Blog
    (10th Circuit)
  • Abstract Appeal
    (11th Circuit)
  • Sentencing Law & Policy
  • On Appeal
  • Inter-Alia
    (Legal Research)
  • Appellate Law & Practice
  • Jim Calloway's Law Practice Tips
  • LegalWikiPro
  • Space Law Station
  • Space Law Probe
  • New Mexico Labor & Employment Law
  • Bag and Baggage
  • Terra Extraneus
  • The Rocket Docket

Navigate

  • Home
  • Author's Profile
  • Contact

Notice

    January 5, 2009.
    I'm back after a long absence from blogging. In the next few days I will be posting new summaries. Unfortunately, there will be a gap in coverage between June 26th and December 31st, 2008.
    - Russ

Public Service


Cost of the War in Iraq
(JavaScript Error)
To see more details, click here.

Visit

  • The liberal alternative to Drudge.
  • SomaFM independent internet radio

Credits

  • Powered by Blogger

  • Site Meter

Monday, January 29, 2007

Reasonableness of sentence is determined by reasonableness of length of sentence and reasonableness of method by which sentence was calculated

EVIDENCE/SENTENCING
United States v. Hall,
No. 05-1205, ___ F.3d ___ (10th Cir. Jan. 23, 2007)(Colorado).

Defendant’s appeal of conviction and sentence for possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute and conspiracy and aiding-abetting conspiracy to distribute crack cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A)(iii), 846, and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Government’s cross–appeal of defendant’s sentence.

HELD:

(1) District court did not abuse discretion in admitting shotgun and ammunition into evidence even though firearm and ammunition were seized in vehicle outside defendant’s residence and not linked to any alleged drug transaction. Items such as firearms, large sums of cash, and uncharged quantities of illegal drugs are tools of the trade in distribution of illegal drugs. As such, they are probative of defendant’s participation in drug distribution business.

(2) Where evidence consisted of transcripts of telephone calls orchestrating drug transaction and videotape of defendant entering and leaving truck of other drug dealer, evidence was insufficient to support conviction on count alleging possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. If prosecution does not present evidence of drug possession (e.g., analysis of chemical composition of some seized narcotic substance), its circumstantial evidence must include some testimony linking defendant to an observed substance jury can infer to be narcotic.

(3) Appellate review of reasonableness of sentence requires review of reasonableness of length of sentence as well as reasonableness of method by which sentence is calculated. Sentence is not reasonable if method by which it was calculated is unreasonable. Ordinarily, procedural irregularity in calculating sentence occurs when district court determines applicable guidelines range. However, where district court’s method of applying 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)’s sentencing factors to fashion below-guidelines sentence is unreasonable (i.e., unexplained), such error renders resulting sentence unreasonable.

Read the opinion here.

posted by Russ at 12:01 PM


Comments on "Reasonableness of sentence is determined by reasonableness of length of sentence and reasonableness of method by which sentence was calculated"

 

post a comment