Reference
  • Supreme Court
  • Home
  • Slip Opinions
  • Docket
  • Tenth Circuit
  • Home
  • Opinions (10th Cir.)
  • Opinions (Washburn Univ.)
  • Tenth Circuit and Fed. Rules Appellate Procedure
  • Docket via PACER Log-in
  • Register for PACER
  • Oral Argument Calendar
  • Related Sites
  • Federal Court Links
  • U.S. Sentencing Commission
  • Admin Office U.S. Courts
  • PACER Service Center
  • U.S. Code via LII
  • Code Federal Regs via LII
  • Federal Rules Crim Procedure via LII
  • Federal Rules of Evidence via LII
  • U.S. Sentencing Guidelines
  • GPO Access
  • Thomas U.S. Congress
  • Federal Criminal Jury Instructions
  • Oklahoma Public Legal Research System
Other Useful Links
  • How Appealing
  • SCOTUS Blog
  • Jurist
  • Scribes
  • Legal Writing Institute
  • Wayne Schiess's
    legal-writing blog
  • Legal Writing Prof Blog
  • Legal Research & Writing
  • Council of Appellate
    Staff Attys
  • Second Opinions
    (2nd Circuit)
  • Sixth Circuit Law
    (6th Circuit)
  • Criminal Appeal
    (9th Circuit)
  • Rocky Mtn Appellate Blog
    (10th Circuit)
  • Abstract Appeal
    (11th Circuit)
  • Sentencing Law & Policy
  • On Appeal
  • Inter-Alia
    (Legal Research)
  • Appellate Law & Practice
  • Jim Calloway's Law Practice Tips
  • LegalWikiPro
  • Space Law Station
  • Space Law Probe
  • New Mexico Labor & Employment Law
  • Bag and Baggage
  • Terra Extraneus
  • The Rocket Docket

Navigate

  • Home
  • Author's Profile
  • Contact

Notice

    January 5, 2009.
    I'm back after a long absence from blogging. In the next few days I will be posting new summaries. Unfortunately, there will be a gap in coverage between June 26th and December 31st, 2008.
    - Russ

Public Service


Cost of the War in Iraq
(JavaScript Error)
To see more details, click here.

Visit

  • The liberal alternative to Drudge.
  • SomaFM independent internet radio

Credits

  • Powered by Blogger

  • Site Meter

Tuesday, February 03, 2009

Conviction for possession of methamphetamine does not require showing that total quantity of possessed substance is 100% pure methamphetamine

JURY INSTRUCTION/STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION
United States v. Villegas,
No. 08-4078, ___ F.3d ___ (10th Cir. Feb. 2, 2009)(Utah).

Appeal of conviction for possession with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of actual or pure methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A) and § 841(b)(1)(A)(viii).

HELD: District court properly instructed jury on drug quantities necessary for conviction. Title 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A)(viii)’s threshold of “50 grams of methamphetamine” does not mean entire substance must consist of 100% pure methamphetamine. Rather, the statutory language refers to the amount of methamphetamine present in a mixture such that the mixture contains at least 50 grams of methamphetamine. For example, a 439.5 gram package of crystalline material that a small sample shows is 85.1% methamphetamine means that there are 374 grams of actual or pure methamphetamine in the package (i.e., 439.5 grams x 85.1% = 374 grams).

Read the opinion here.

posted by Russ at 4:33 PM


Comments on "Conviction for possession of methamphetamine does not require showing that total quantity of possessed substance is 100% pure methamphetamine"

 

post a comment