Reference
  • Supreme Court
  • Home
  • Slip Opinions
  • Docket
  • Tenth Circuit
  • Home
  • Opinions (10th Cir.)
  • Opinions (Washburn Univ.)
  • Tenth Circuit and Fed. Rules Appellate Procedure
  • Docket via PACER Log-in
  • Register for PACER
  • Oral Argument Calendar
  • Related Sites
  • Federal Court Links
  • U.S. Sentencing Commission
  • Admin Office U.S. Courts
  • PACER Service Center
  • U.S. Code via LII
  • Code Federal Regs via LII
  • Federal Rules Crim Procedure via LII
  • Federal Rules of Evidence via LII
  • U.S. Sentencing Guidelines
  • GPO Access
  • Thomas U.S. Congress
  • Federal Criminal Jury Instructions
  • Oklahoma Public Legal Research System
Other Useful Links
  • How Appealing
  • SCOTUS Blog
  • Jurist
  • Scribes
  • Legal Writing Institute
  • Wayne Schiess's
    legal-writing blog
  • Legal Writing Prof Blog
  • Legal Research & Writing
  • Council of Appellate
    Staff Attys
  • Second Opinions
    (2nd Circuit)
  • Sixth Circuit Law
    (6th Circuit)
  • Criminal Appeal
    (9th Circuit)
  • Rocky Mtn Appellate Blog
    (10th Circuit)
  • Abstract Appeal
    (11th Circuit)
  • Sentencing Law & Policy
  • On Appeal
  • Inter-Alia
    (Legal Research)
  • Appellate Law & Practice
  • Jim Calloway's Law Practice Tips
  • LegalWikiPro
  • Space Law Station
  • Space Law Probe
  • New Mexico Labor & Employment Law
  • Bag and Baggage
  • Terra Extraneus
  • The Rocket Docket

Navigate

  • Home
  • Author's Profile
  • Contact

Notice

    January 5, 2009.
    I'm back after a long absence from blogging. In the next few days I will be posting new summaries. Unfortunately, there will be a gap in coverage between June 26th and December 31st, 2008.
    - Russ

Public Service


Cost of the War in Iraq
(JavaScript Error)
To see more details, click here.

Visit

  • The liberal alternative to Drudge.
  • SomaFM independent internet radio

Credits

  • Powered by Blogger

  • Site Meter

Thursday, December 08, 2005

Defendant bears burden of showing improper coercion when seeking exclusion of coerced third party testimony

DUE PROCESS/SENTENCING
United States v. Dowell,
No. 03-1341, ___ F.3d ___ (10th Cir. Dec. 6, 2005)(Colorado).

Appeal of conviction and sentence for destroying government property by fire and forcibly interfering with IRS employees and administration in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2, 844(f)(1) and (2), and 26 U.S.C. § 7212(a).

HELD:

(1) While government bears burden of demonstrating voluntariness of defendant’s admissions or confessions, when defendant moves to exclude coerced testimony of third party on due process grounds, burden of proving improper coercion is on defendant.

(2) Jury’s verdict convicting defendant of interfering with IRS encompassed two factual findings necessary for sentencing guideline terrorism enhancement to apply. Therefore, district court did not violate Sixth Amendment by applying terrorism enhancement to sentence.

Read the opinion here.

posted by Russ at 4:03 PM


Comments on "Defendant bears burden of showing improper coercion when seeking exclusion of coerced third party testimony"

 

post a comment